Approach · GLP Compliance Validation

Taking the handoffs out of
nonclinical evaluation

Seno.Bio Platform Team · updated 2026-07-27

A device developer preparing a nonclinical safety package usually ends up coordinating four workstreams at once — biocompatibility, safety evaluation, durability testing and CMC documentation — often across separate vendors. Every handoff costs something: samples get re-prepared, the product gets re-explained, and data arrives in formats that have to be reconciled before it can go into a submission.

How we structure it

These workstreams are run as one programme rather than four engagements. Organ-chip prescreening sits ahead of the animal phase; the GLP studies themselves are carried out at the Yangtze River Delta National Innovation Centre for Drug Safety Evaluation Technology, which sits within the same national innovation system as the platform; submission coordination is handled on the same programme.

Why prescreening sits ahead of the GLP phase
Screening material and formulation options in vitro means the animal study that follows is targeted rather than exploratory. Candidates likely to fail are filtered out before they consume animal-phase budget and calendar time, and the in-vitro work supplies mechanistic data that supports the interpretation of the final report.
What it does not change
Prescreening does not remove an animal study that the applicable regulation requires. It changes what enters that study and how well prepared the data package is when it gets there. Where a submission requires GLP-accredited data, that data is generated at the evaluation centre — not substituted with in-vitro results.
What to expect if you engage

At scoping we confirm the device classification, the applicable test battery, and whether the required tests fall within the evaluation centre's accredited scope. If any part of your programme falls outside it, we will say so at that point rather than after contracting.

ON DISCLOSURE

This page describes how the platform structures this type of programme. It is not a report on a single named engagement: client identity, product details, project timelines and commercial terms are covered by confidentiality agreements and are not disclosed.

Have an evaluation programme to plan?

Explore GLP Compliance ValidationContact Us